Day 1: Thursday, November 5, 2026
Welcome and Land Acknowledgement (9:00 – 9:20)
Rob Seto (he/him) — CLEBC, Vancouver
Alec Guerin — Musqueam Knowledge Keeper, Musqueam Indian Band, Vancouver
Sandra F. Guarascio (she/her) — Roper Greyell LLP, Vancouver
Lindsay Waddell (she/her) — Moore Edgar Lyster LLP, Vancouver
Case Law Update (9:20 – 10:20)
- key cases
- analysis and trends
- effects on practice
Christopher M. McHardy (he/him) — McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Vancouver
Meredith Shaw (she/her) — Community Legal Assistance Society, Vancouver
Lauren Soubolsky (she/her) — McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Vancouver
You Don't Want To Go There (Even if You Think You Do): Practical and Legal Tips on How to Avoid Human Rights Litigation (10:20 – 11:10)
- risks if one party in an ongoing relationship stops talking to another over a human rights issue—how might that impact litigation if you do have to go there?
- the importance of perspective-taking for preventing and responding to human rights issues or conflicts
- practical steps for (1) creating a positive and preventative culture, and (2) early and effective resolution when issues do arise
- how far should parties go in trying to help others feel heard; how and to what extent do apologies help or hurt?
Rosalie A. Cress (she/her) — Southern Law LLP, North Vancouver
Jessica L. Derynck (she/her) — Southern Law LLP, North Vancouver
BREAK (11:10 – 11:25)
Remedies at the BC Human Rights Tribunal vs. Labour Arbitration (11:25 – 12:15)
Both human rights tribunals and labour arbitrators have authority to remedy human rights violations within their respective areas. However, distinct approaches have developed to these remedies in human rights law and labour law. The authors propose to compare the remedies of labour arbitrators and human rights tribunals, including compensation for injury to dignity, feelings and self-respect, and public interest remedies. The authors will address:
- the different sources of remedial authority
- common principles but different applications in the two areas; including: injury to dignity, public interest remedies, and reinstatement
- practical considerations for settlement discussions
An approach to remedial issues can be enriched by considering how different decision makers have addressed similar issues in both forums.
Afifa Hashimi (she/her) — Moore Edgar Lyster LLP, Vancouver
Daniel McBain (he/him) — Moore Edgar Lyster LLP, Vancouver
LUNCH (12:15 – 1:45) with Featured Speaker (at approx. 1:00)
Blowing Off Steam: Challenging Mis and Dis Information
Kasari Govender, KC (she/her) — Human Rights Commissioner of BC, Vancouver
Junior Lawyers Panel: Dear Senior Counsel and Other Decision Makers (1:45 – 2:35)
Moderators:
Kristen Kasting (she/her) — Legal Counsel, BC Public School Employers Association, Vancouver
David G. Wong (he/him) — Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP, Vancouver
BC Human Rights Tribunal Update (2:35 – 3:20)
- update on tribunal delays, challenges, and initiatives
- discussions of some key issues
- preview of what to expect in the remainder of the fiscal year
Emily Ohler, KC (she/her) — Chair, BC Human Rights Tribunal, Vancouver
BREAK (3:20 – 3:35)
Ethics Fact Patterns (3:35 – 4:30)
- what would/should you do?
- discussions in context
Jitesh Mistry (he/him) — Jitesh Mistry, Labour Arbitration and Mediation Services, Burnaby
Gabrielle M. Scorer (she/her) — Roper Greyell LLP, Vancouver
Laura Track (she/her) — Community Legal Assistance Society, Vancouver
Day 2: Friday, November 6, 2026
Welcome (9:00 – 9:05)
Rob Seto (he/him) — CLEBC, Vancouver
Sandra F. Guarascio (she/her) — Roper Greyell LLP, Vancouver
Lindsay Waddell (she/her) — Moore Edgar Lyster LLP, Vancouver
Judicial Review Update (9:05 – 10:00)
- review and update of significant BC Supreme Court, BC Court of Appeal, and Supreme Court of Canada cases
Matthew Allard (he/him) — Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP, Vancouver
Shawnee Monchalin (she/her) — Legal Counsel, BC Human Rights Tribunal, Vancouver
Brick Walls and Brave Dolls: A Critical Survey of the BC Human Rights Tribunal as a Means for Addressing Gaps in Gender-Affirming Care (10:00 – 10:40)
- history of gender-affirming care access in BC, the BCHRT's role, and SAGAH's 2026 Report on 2S/TNB care in BC
- recent discrimination cases: Child Q v. Dr. A; Hamilton v. BC MSP
- systemic gaps in care: KW v. BC Ministry of Health
- a better forum? Ontario (Health Insurance Plan) v. K.S.
- trauma informed, trans competent lessons for serving 2S/TNB clients
Sep Memarazad (she/her) — QMUNITY Legal Clinic, Vancouver
River Shannon (she/her) — QMUNITY Legal Clinic, Vancouver
BREAK (10:40 – 10:55)
Hybrid or Compromise? Revisiting the Approach to Human Rights in Labour Law in BC (10:55 – 11:45)
- review of arbitral jurisdiction to interpret and apply human rights legislation in BC
- review of human rights and the "hybrid" approach applied by labour arbitrators
- review of the application of the law and outcomes by labour arbitrators compared to human rights tribunals
- how labour arbitrators can apply human rights legislation and provide remedies for union workers that best promote the purposes of human rights in the workplace
Kayla Bergsson (she/her) — Victory Square Law Office LLP, Vancouver
Rebecca Kantwerg (she/they) — Victory Square Law Office LLP, Vancouver
Menopause: Are Our Workplace Accommodation Systems Ready? (11:45 – 12:35)
Navigating workplace accommodations for menopausal symptoms is a challenge for workers and employers. This presentation will cover the legal framework as well as practical barriers and suggestion for change, including:
- review of law in Canada and abroad
- review of recent Canadian studies on the health, career, and broader economic impacts of menopause
- barriers in our current workplace accommodation processes
- a case for change
Jessica Forman (she/her) — Forte Workplace Law, Surrey
Sara Forte (she/her) — Forte Workplace Law, Surrey
Jaspreet Mann (she/her) — Forte Workplace Law, Surrey
NETWORKING LUNCH (12:35 – 1:35)
Substantive Update on the Human Rights Commissioner's Inquiry and Intervention Activity (1:35 – 2:25)
- updates on Commissioner's inquiries
- exclusion of media from the April 2023 Hastings decampment (Un(media)ted report)
- disproportionate impact of police use of force on Indigenous, Black, and other racialized people and/or on people with mental health issues
- updates on cases in which the Commissioner was/is an intervenor or is seeking leave to intervene
- Fox, Scheu and Smith v. City of Victoria
- Gitxaala and Ehattesaht v. HM the King in the Right of BC
- Kishawi v. Vancouver Island University
- Roy, Littlejohn and BCCLA v. City of Vancouver
- BC Teachers Federation obo Chilliwack Teachers" Association v. Barry Neufeld
Carly Hyman (she/her) — General Counsel, BC's Office of the Human Rights Commissioner, Victoria
Guuduniia La Boucan (she/her) — Staff Lawyer, BC's Office of the Human Rights Commissioner, Victoria
Brandon Macleod — Staff Lawyer, BC's Office of the Human Rights Commissioner, Vancouver
Jennifer Metcalfe — Staff Lawyer, BC's Office of the Human Rights Commissioner, Vancouver
BREAK (2:25 – 2:40)
Indigenous Remedies and UNDRIP in Human Rights Cases (2:40 – 3:30)
- how the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) applies to human rights legislation, in light of Gitxaala v. British Columbia (Chief Gold Commissioner), 2025 BCCA 430
- the importance of Indigenous-specific human rights remedies, including remedies under Indigenous legal orders, in cases of Indigenous discrimination
- how practitioners can implement UNDRIP in their work, including:
- Indigenous-specific remedies achieved in recent Heiltsuk Nation Indigenous consumer racism cases
- how Indigenous practitioners, who experience institutional discrimination themselves, can use UNDRIP in their practices and support their clients through colonial human rights processes that remain inaccessible to many Indigenous complainants
Michelle Casavant, KC (she/her) — Casavant Law, Vancouver
Lisa C. Fong, KC (she/her) — Ng Ariss Fong, Vancouver
Ruben Tillman (he/him) — Ng Ariss Fong, Vancouver
Governance Gone Awry: When Board Decisions Become Human Rights Complaints (3:30 – 4:20)
- panel discussion of common scenarios with governance challenges
- effects of interference or inaction by board and council members
- interplay between professional regulation and human rights duties
- practical strategies and applicable case law
Dimple Kainth (she/her) — Satya Law, Burnaby
Fiona H. McFarlane (she/her) — KSW Lawyers, Surrey
Kirsten Hume Scrimshaw (she/her) — Ally Workplace Law, North Vancouver
Closing Comments (4:20 – 4:25)
Sandra F. Guarascio (she/her) — Roper Greyell LLP, Vancouver
Lindsay Waddell (she/her) — Moore Edgar Lyster LLP, Vancouver